In a significant legal development, a federal judge has ruled in favor of CNN, dismissing the $475 million defamation lawsuit filed by former President Donald Trump. U.S. District Judge Raag Singhal delivered the decision, stating that the on-air references made by CNN to “the Big Lie” were deemed matters of opinion, rather than factual statements.
The lawsuit centered around Trump’s baseless claims of election theft and his contention that the network’s references created a false and inflammatory association between him and Adolf Hitler. However, the court’s ruling concluded that these references were protected under the right to free speech and fell within the realm of expressing opinion.
The dismissal of this high-profile lawsuit comes as a significant victory for CNN and its legal team, as it had been embroiled in a contentious legal battle with the former president for allegedly damaging his reputation. The judge’s decision reinforces the importance of distinguishing between fact and opinion in media reporting, particularly in cases involving public figures.
Donald Trump’s legal team had sought a substantial compensation of $475 million for the alleged defamation, but the court’s ruling has now put an end to that pursuit. The outcome may have implications for similar cases in the future, setting a precedent on how courts view statements related to public figures and controversial political issues.
A global media for the latest news, entertainment, music fashion, and more.
