WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal judge on Friday halted the Trump administration’s controversial plan to place thousands of employees at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) on administrative leave, delivering a temporary reprieve to an agency central to global humanitarian efforts.
Key Developments
- Judge’s Ruling: U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols issued a temporary restraining order blocking the administration from placing 2,200 USAID employees on paid leave just hours before the midnight deadline. The order also paused plans to withdraw nearly all overseas staff within 30 days and left open the possibility of reinstating 500 employees already placed on leave.
Nichols emphasized that the plaintiffs—unions representing federal workers—had demonstrated “irreparable harm” to employees and global aid operations, while the government faced “zero harm” from a short-term pause. - Lawsuit Basis: The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the American Foreign Service Association (AFSA) filed the lawsuit, arguing that President Donald Trump lacked constitutional authority to dismantle USAID without congressional approval. They accused the administration of creating a “global humanitarian crisis” by abruptly halting aid programs and jeopardizing U.S. strategic interests.
- Administration’s Defense: Justice Department lawyers claimed the staffing cuts were necessary to address alleged “corruption and fraud” at USAID but provided no evidence to support these claims during the hearing. Judge Nichols criticized the administration’s haste, questioning the urgency of the midnight deadline.
Broader Context
- USAID’s Role: The agency, established in 1961, employs approximately 10,000 workers, two-thirds of whom are stationed abroad. It manages over $40 billion annually in humanitarian aid, including programs addressing famine, disease, and conflict-related crises.
Impact of Cuts: Immediate consequences of the proposed cuts included halting $450 million in food aid for 36 million people and disrupting water access for 1.6 million displaced individuals in Sudan’s Darfur region. Overseas staff faced abrupt relocation orders, with families forced to uproot children mid-school year.
Political Reactions
- Trump’s Stance: The president expressed his opinion on social media, calling USAID “corrupt” and urging its closure. His administration, supported by the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has targeted USAID as part of a broader effort to shrink federal agencies.
Criticism from Democrats: Lawmakers and former USAID officials warned that dismantling the agency would cede global influence to rivals like China and Russia while undermining humanitarian efforts. Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the cuts as aligning aid with “national interest,” but agency staff denied claims of financial mismanagement.
What’s Next
Lawmakers and former USAID officials warned that dismantling the agency would cede global influence to rivals like China and Russia while undermining humanitarian efforts. Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the cuts as aligning aid with “national interest,” but agency staff denied claims of financial mismanagement.
Conclusion
Friday’s ruling underscores the escalating legal battles surrounding the Trump administration’s efforts to reshape federal institutions. For now, USAID’s operations remain in limbo, with its workforce and global beneficiaries awaiting clarity on the agency’s future.
A global media for the latest news, entertainment, music fashion, and more.
